The production on the whole is unique in its endeavor to bridge the gap between non-Shakespearean theatergoer and Shakespeare’s work and on the whole is well done, well worth investigating
...for my money was as good as any of the plays I’ve seen at the Kennedy Center, and performed with more authentic feeling
by Amanda N. Gunther, Theatrebloom
Discomfort guides this servant’s tongue, you see
When first to speak on the venue known as the DCAC
But fear not, playgoers, for I share with you
Good news of The Rude Mechanicals and their show of Richard II
Laboriously titled The Life and Death Of
They present to you from one floor above
A judiciously rendered version that moves quite free
Of this early and poetic tale of history
Directed by Michael F. McCarthy and penned by the Bard
‘Tis a ho-hum tale, ‘t’wont make you think too hard.
The child-king Richard, that’s II not III
No cripple on this stage will audiences’ see
Excepting York and his palsy, but that’s just one hand
One small choice from one very tall man
Let me stop the hyperbole and purple prose too
And get to it proper, by it— this review
While Michael F. McCarthy is the show’s Director, Assistant Director Alan Duda has stepped up to the plate with a long-coming concept deep in hibernation with The Rude Mechanicals now brought to light and fruition. Bridging the gap between the company’s audience and the work they do has been a long-standing goal of Duda’s as well as of the company. Finding a way to make Shakespeare more accessible to the masses who are not necessarily familiar with the text, the time, the language, etc., or who enjoy theatre but just don’t have a readily working knowledge of Shakespearean understanding, is something Duda has achieved with the framework he has layered over this current production of Richard II.
Introducing the show, in full period getup, as “PSI”— meaning pre-captioned for the Shakespearean Impaired— Duda plays the role of William Shakespeare himself, “spoiling” the plot as the show gets underway. In a clever and well-crafted series of rhyming verses that follow the iconic meter of the Bard but use modern language, Duda provides little couplets of information before each scene to allow the audience a basic understanding of what they’re about to witness. This is an excellent way to make a connection with the archaic text and dated language used therein. By providing a similar cadence and rhythm of speech patterns, laced with modern words, the audience— even those familiar with Shakespeare (and especially those who are but find the histories to be dull or uninteresting or confusing)— are more readily able to process and digest the scenes they witness. Duda deserves a pat on the back for his ability to create clever rhyme— all of which he penned himself— that tells the story without giving away too much in each of the explanatory interludes.
Director Michael F. McCarthy is able to take a lengthy, albeit poetically striking, history and judiciously render it into a swiftly moving, abridged stage adaptation that keeps the plot and character strengths intact. McCarthy should also be praised for his subtle use of stage blocking when it comes to the limited venue space provided in the DCAC. During the tower encounter, McCarthy stages both parties in parallel stances to one another, both facing outward with one party staring out and upward as if craning their gaze up to those ensconced in the tower, and the other party glancing downward. This allows for suspension of disbelief when it comes to the lack of scenic difference and overall physically leveled play space. Overall the pacing of McCarthy’s production is smooth, no hiccups or bumps along the way, though the nature of the show itself is somewhat dull. This is a factor that sadly cannot be helped; Shakespeare simply didn’t pen Richard II to be invigorating and full of gruesome action or hysterical antics.
The fluidity of the production’s pacing is assisted by Sound Designer Eric Honour, whose inclusion of sound effects is sparing but well matched to the overall simplistic aesthetic of the performance. A clopping horse hoof here and there along with the somber tolling of bells when appropriate is all Honour needs to draw the audience into the theatricality of the experience, keeping it realistic without adding too heavy a dose of sensationalism. Lighting Operator Luke Craver assists in this department as well, shifting the lights up and down whenever the character of Shakespeare is speaking and again when scenes start and finish. These basic approaches to designs, along with traditionally period appropriate costumes done in the vein of minimalism, allow the audience to focus on the substance of the plot rather than the spectacle of theatrical engagement.
There are few downsides to the production, other than the show’s inherent dullness, which to some may be fascinating, and on the whole is no one’s fault but Shakespeare’s. In an attempt to age his character, the Duke of York, actor Joshua Engel takes on a forced vocal mutation which softens his speaking and even in the intimate spacing makes him difficult to hear and understand. This problem persists in his moment of uproarious outrage, as Engel takes the character to a polar extreme of raging fury, but is shouting so forcibly that the articulation of his words go by the wayside. This aside, Engel’s performance is well-received, particularly in the consistency with which he affects his physicality— demonstrating York’s palsy.
One of the most enjoyable characterizations in the production is that of John of Gaunt, portrayed by Wayne De Cesar. The reeling monologue, which features many a pun on his name, is fascinating, delivered with a perfect balance of humor and severity and the sudden switch between the two happens so flawlessly that it’s an oral sleight of hand. Note too De Cesar’s brief portrayal in the second act as the Queen’s Groomsman, a hilarious little burble of understated comedic relief in the production, complete with a fusty affection of voice and appropriation of physical stance. The Queen (Claudia Bach) says more with her reactive listening, as expressed through detailed facial features, than she does with the actual text she is given, rendered to almost nothing in this edited version of the production. Bach does err on the side of emotionally overactive when retreating into her text, but it makes the parting scene between her and the titular character rather striking.
Our brief encounter with The Duke of Norfolk Thomas Mowbray (Peter Eichman) is fleeting but memorable. Appearing only in the scene where he is banished, Eichman makes the most out of his glorious seconds in the spotlight. With a ferocious temperament and equally frightening stance and sense of physical presence, Eichman makes Mowbray a character to be feared. This, however, is juxtaposed sharply against an equally ferociously present Earl of Hereford, Henry Bolingbroke (played by the incomparable Jaki Demarest.) With vibrating vim, Demarest goes for the jugular in this verbal spar against Eichman, and the resulting war of the words is an intense one.
Demarest delivers an emotional roller coaster of an experience as Bolingbroke. The harrowing finale scene, featuring the brutal dismissal of Exton (Liana Olear) and the end of Richard II (Sarah Pfanz), is Demarest’s pearl, shucked clean with brute emotional strength from the play which she’s transfigured into her oyster. Olear, whose approach to entering that scene is quite remarkable, flees upon Demarest’s outcry and even if it weren’t scripted in that fashion, her response makes Demarest’s expressions that much more meaningful.
Like a color guard on the march for Demarest’s banner of brilliance in this production, Bishop Carlisle (Lynda Clark) and the Duke of Aumerle (John Wallis) create moments of poetic justice around her, serving as her council and as physical decoration to her insurmountable stage presence. Clark and Wallis, much like Erin Nealer, playing Sir William Bagot the Knight of the Shire, hold their own in scenes with Demarest, making for an intriguing dynamic of characters and the way that several of these characters have been amalgamated from other characters which did not make the final cut in the production.
Sarah Pfanz dons the crown quite literally as Richard II. Bringing a rare but uniquely appreciated youthful exuberance to the titular role, Pfanz does a brilliant job of creating a sympathetic character out of this child-king. Pfanz’ mannerisms and overall approach to the text readily portrays the naiveté and simplicity of the character without delving into the potential veins of adolescent tantrums, madness, or other pitfalls that all too often gather around this iconic Shakespearean character. Much like Demarest, Pfanz has an exceptional hold on the Bard’s language, meter, and overall delivery of the outdated text and makes her emotional connections with the character crystal clear.
The production on the whole is unique in its endeavor to bridge the gap between non-Shakespearean theatergoer and Shakespeare’s work and on the whole is well done, well worth investigating. The production has five performances over the course of its run, tickets are limited as the venue has limited capacity. Do not wait to purchase your tickets for The Life and Death of Richard II.
Running Time: Approximately 1 hour and 45 minutes with one intermission
Shame … shame on me for having lived in Washington DC for so many years while The Rude Mechanicals were performing their unique works of art, yet remaining entirely ignorant of their very existence.
The Rude Mechanicals are a theater troupe who enjoy performing Shakespeare, and a few other interesting plays, at venues throughout the Washington DC area. They just wrapped up a run of Richard II, which for my money was as good as any of the plays I’ve seen at the Kennedy Center, and performed with more authentic feeling.
Because they were performing in DC’s Adams Morgan neighborhood at the DC Arts Center instead of their regular venue of the Greenbelt Arts Center, the feeling was intimate with minimalist scenery. In fact, the grand total of the background props was this throne-like chair, which was used to good effect by King Richard:
Speaking of King Richard, the actor who portrayed him was superb, and not just because of her naturally regal appearance. Sarah Pfanz showed tremendous range and depth, first embodying the pomposity of a monarch who truly believes himself to be occupying the throne by divine right (and therefore nearly as as omnipotent as god Himself). But when fortune takes a turn for the worse, as usually happens in Shakespeare, she effortlessly portrayed Richard’s initially boundless ego starting to bump up painfully against bounds after all … bounds that closed in like hoops of steel. Sarah’s body language, facial expressions and tone of voice convincingly realized this jarring fall from grace. Not only was she able to faultlessly memorize hundreds of Shakespearean lines (how do actors do this??), but she delivered them with genuine feeling that had me feeling sorry for the contemptible Richard II.
Although founder and President of The Rude Mechanicals, Joshua Engel chose the relatively modest (in terms of stage time and number of lines) role of the Duke of York. He played York with remarkable presence and poise as the strong, mostly silent type who nevertheless is the linchpin of Richard II’s pivot from glory to the grave. The rest of the cast was equally awesome serving as equal parts halo and penumbra about the doomed king. A particular standout was Wayne de Cesar, a man who seems to have been born to act, in a memorable turn as John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster.
This production also included a small but brilliantly innovative fillip that I haven’t seen in other plays. Alan Duda, elegantly dressed as the Bard of Avon himself, sat in the front row of the audience. In the pause before each major scene, he would take the stage and deliver a pithy rhymed couplet or quatrain foreshadowing the action about to unfold. His witticisms were perfectly couched, briefly lightening an otherwise tragic emotional tone and whetting my appetite for each new scene.
Apparently performing Shakespeare in traditional Medieval costume is a bit of a departure for The Rude Mechanicals, so I’m interested to see how they will interpret future offerings. If you find yourself in the DC area (poor fellow!) check out their list of Productions - the Rude Mechanicals and enjoy one of the things that makes our nation’s capital a much better place than it appears to be on … ugh … Fox News Channel 5.
The Rude Mechanicals 
